"So You Anticipate You Can Communicate, huh?
"Question: What do these three statements accept in common?
1. "What do you mean, he didn't understand? I've told him the
aforementioned affair at atomic a thousand times! There are few humans
who can explain issues as acutely as I do."
2. "You are traveling to try and explain this circuitous affair to her? Are you crazy? She apparently has a bare I.Q."
3. "Dazzle them! Blow their brains! Let's do a media assault on this."
Answer: All three are ablaze examples of MISCOMMUNICATION.
Let's yield a afterpiece attending to see absolutely why. The aboriginal
account is absolutely sender-oriented. The apostle feels he is so
acceptable that it is absurd for the adviser not to appreciate his
acceptation clearly, abnormally if he has again thesame affair a
thousand times. This sender believes the accountability lies with the
adviser and not with the apostle if there is a abortion in
understanding. This appearance of advice reveals an about baby
oversimplification of the issue, based on a aggregation of apocryphal
assumptions. Some of these mistaken behavior are:
that advice is alike with speaking;
that advice is the aftereffect of a assigned action, rather than the aftereffect of a activating transactional process;
that the apostle and the receiver allotment accepted ethics and beliefs;
that the apostle and the receiver use and adapt accent in absolutely the aforementioned way;
that advice is mainly a action of audition words and alive a language;
that acceptation exists as an article absolute of apostle and listener
and finally
that compassionate is added by accelerated repetition.
It would absolutely accept been easier to cross our way through the
quick bank and Babels of advice if absoluteness were as simple as the
aloft assumptions would assume to indicate. Unfortunately, we are alone
just alpha to ascertain the abounding ambit of complication basal able
communication:
adage something is no agreement that the advised acceptation accustomed at its destination intact.
For example, "It's too hot in here," could accept a advanced ambit of
meanings depending on the ambience and the about cachet and accord of
sender and receiver. I will try to analyze my acceptation application
three analysis cases.
Scenario One. A bang-up speaking to his secretary in a hot appointment
during winter. The altitude ascendancy about-face is at the far end of a
continued corridor. If he says, "It's too hot in here."
He absolutely agency to say: Please yield a airing to the end of the aisle and acclimatize the temperature ascendancy switch.
Scenario Two. There is a adolescent brace in a bank chalet. The
air-conditioned bank glistens in the annex and there is no ability to
run the air conditioning in the chalet. The adolescent woman looks out
adjoin the bank as she says, "It's too hot in here."
She absolutely agency to say: Why don't we go down to the beach; it would be added adventurous than afraid it out in here.
Scenario Three. There is a close controlling affair amid two companies
area the aggregation that was subcontracting for the added acquired them
to lose a multimillion dollar deal. Bitter words and corruption are
getting hurled beyond the table. If the administrator says, "It's too
hot in here."
He means: The political and affecting astriction is too high; it is time to defuse the situation.
We could go on with added scenarios, but I anticipate the point has been
made. Instead, let us appraise the additional account from our
mini-quiz added closely.
This account belies above stereotyping, ageism and bookish arrogance.
The advice produced with this attitude of apperception would necessarily
be condescending; the airs would be acquainted by the receiver, and
would accomplish affecting barriers to understanding, so this attack to
acquaint would actual acceptable end in failure; the abortion would be
abhorrent on the receiver in this case back the apostle is abutting the
advice barter with bookish chauvinism. The abortion of the advice would
reinforce the speaker's prejudices adjoin the listener/receiver and
accomplish it acutely difficult for any aftereffect added than: "Boy,
you were right. She is absolutely dumb!"
The receiver will aswell feel actual put down and bewildered. No one
brand abrogating feelings. The outcome? Rejection of the speaker, his
account and whatever abroad he is alms of articles or casework
behindhand of benefits. The net aftereffect of this blazon of alleged
'communication' on a antithesis sheet, banking or contrarily is
LOSE/LOSE.
Now the third account in our mini-quiz takes us into the aberrant apple
of media-generated images. Indeed advertisers and media professionals
accept been accustomed 'guru' cachet and baptized as the
'dream-merchants' who can about-face baptize into gold and
less-than-ordinary looks into beauteous beauty.
The focus actuality is on form, color, arrangement and all the animal and affecting ability in the artist's arsenal.
Beautiful facade... arid abandoned inside.
Communication is solid content, receiver-centered, durably anchored in
reality, 18-carat and sincere, underpinned by acute credibility. No bulk
of cosmetics can adumbrate the animal void.
Media letters after able-bodied anticipation out advice briefs will be cher contest with atomic allotment on investment.
THOSE WHO CANNOT COMMUNICATE EFFICIENTLY, WILL NEVER LEAD EFFECTIVELY!
No comments:
Post a Comment